Messaging System Architectures Overview¶
This document provides an overview of common messaging system architectures and their use cases.
Common Messaging Architectures¶
1. Publish-Subscribe (Pub-Sub)¶
Publishers send messages to a topic; subscribers receive messages from topics asynchronously.
graph TD
P1[Publisher 1] -->|Message| T[Topic/Channel]
P2[Publisher 2] -->|Message| T
T -->|Message| S1[Subscriber 1]
T -->|Message| S2[Subscriber 2]
T -->|Message| S3[Subscriber 3]
Use Cases: - Event-driven architectures - Real-time notifications - Broadcasting information to multiple consumers
Examples: Kafka, RabbitMQ, Solace
2. Request-Reply¶
Clients send requests and await replies, often used in service bus architectures.
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant S as Service
C->>S: Request
S->>C: Reply
Use Cases: - Synchronous communication - RPC-style messaging - Service-to-service communication
Examples: IBM MQ, RabbitMQ, TIBCO
3. Push-Pull (Work Queue)¶
Tasks are distributed among multiple consumers for parallel processing.
graph TD
P[Producer] -->|Task| Q[Queue]
Q -->|Task| C1[Consumer 1]
Q -->|Task| C2[Consumer 2]
Q -->|Task| C3[Consumer 3]
Use Cases: - Task distribution - Load balancing - Background job processing
Examples: RabbitMQ, Amazon SQS, Redis
4. Fanout¶
A message sent to an exchange is delivered to all bound queues.
graph TD
P[Producer] -->|Message| E[Fanout Exchange]
E -->|Message| Q1[Queue 1]
E -->|Message| Q2[Queue 2]
E -->|Message| Q3[Queue 3]
Use Cases: - Broadcasting updates - Event replication - Multi-consumer scenarios
Examples: RabbitMQ, Apache Pulsar
5. Streaming¶
Continuous data flow processing with ordered message sequences.
graph LR
P[Producer] -->|Stream| T[Topic/Partition]
T -->|Stream| C1[Consumer Group 1]
T -->|Stream| C2[Consumer Group 2]
Use Cases: - Real-time analytics - Event sourcing - Log aggregation
Examples: Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, AWS Kinesis
Architecture Selection Guide¶
Pattern | Best For | Scalability | Complexity |
---|---|---|---|
Pub-Sub | Event-driven systems | High | Medium |
Request-Reply | Synchronous communication | Medium | Low |
Push-Pull | Task distribution | High | Low |
Fanout | Broadcasting | Medium | Low |
Streaming | Real-time processing | Very High | High |
Hybrid Architectures¶
Many modern systems combine multiple patterns:
graph TD
subgraph "Microservices"
MS1[Service A] -->|Request-Reply| MS2[Service B]
MS2 -->|Event| ES[Event Store]
end
subgraph "Event Processing"
ES -->|Stream| SP[Stream Processor]
SP -->|Notification| NS[Notification Service]
end
subgraph "Task Processing"
MS1 -->|Task| TQ[Task Queue]
TQ -->|Task| W1[Worker 1]
TQ -->|Task| W2[Worker 2]
end
Choosing the Right Architecture¶
Consider these factors when selecting an architecture:
- Communication Pattern: Synchronous vs. asynchronous
- Message Volume: Low, medium, or high throughput
- Durability Requirements: Temporary vs. persistent messages
- Ordering Requirements: Strict ordering vs. parallel processing
- Scalability Needs: Horizontal scaling requirements
- Latency Tolerance: Real-time vs. batch processing
Next Steps¶
Once you've identified the appropriate architecture pattern, proceed to the Product Comparison to evaluate specific implementations.